posted 2017-Oct-21, 3:16 pm AEST Get a 1941W, running ZBF the 800 series will be relatively close to the limit, the numbers published by Cisco aren't too far off when it comes to the firewall performance.I wonder if it's the ppp encapsulation or the vdsl and if a combination of both, how much each uses? Highlighted. posted 2017-Mar-8, 9:29 am AEST posted 2017-Oct-21, 3:16 pm AEST

posted 2017-Apr-30, 2:32 am AEST




Any reason why you want/need a Cisco IOS router for at home?

as i said, i think the processing required for VDSL is killing it. Do I really need to go to a 1941 to get 100Mbs?Which IOS version are you running, some versions can have processing bugs that result in abnormal CPU usage. posted 2017-Mar-7, 10:44 pm AEST Hi, I have a Cisco 1801W that I … posted 2017-Oct-22, 12:21 pm AEST Cisco has always been a little bit cagey about their bandwidth numbers. But if you threw nothing but 64 byte packets at the router, you might get substantially less. from March 2017; to October 2017; last updated – posted 2017-Oct-24, 12:11 pm AEST posted 2017-Oct-24, 12:11 pm AEST User #124878 792 posts. DS Channel1 DS Channel0 US Channel1 US Channel0 Archive View Return to standard view. posted 2017-Mar-7, 12:02 pm AEST posted 2017-Oct-24, 12:11 pm AEST

Might be easier to just use a bridged modem.thanks for the the suggestion, just tried with this ios version (had to specify the firmware for the vdsl module this time) ..... same thing , around the same speed, 99% cpu.... :( posted 2017-Oct-22, 1:18 pm AEST posted 2017-Mar-7, 11:11 am AEST O.P. posted 2017-Mar-7, 6:21 pm AEST posted 2017-Oct-21, 4:22 pm AEST posted 2017-Mar-7, 10:14 pm AEST posted 2017-Mar-8, 9:51 am AEST But, it still doesn't seem to work. And I wouldn't want anything less than 802.11ac today.

posted 2017-Mar-8, 9:51 am AEST

a Netgear V7610 however I am needing something more reliable, rack mounted and high end where I can simply bridge the VDSL to the Ethernet port on the bridge and then connect it into a port designated WAN on our existing router.

Uksa007. Does VLANs. posted 2017-Mar-7, 6:21 pm AEST )I have a Cisco 1801W that I have been using with ADSL as my edge router/firewall etc, it has served me well for many years. The hardware is way overpowered. Services provided via NBN Co, Opticomm, Open Networks, Red Train, LBN Co, and TPG FttBhttp://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/c ... 34157.htmlWe have submitted the FTTN product spec to Cisco to see if they support the 25 or so criteria that NBN require, once they have come back to us, Exetel will consider submitting the relevant Cisco 800, and 1900 series model to be certified for use.↳   Anything else anyone wants to discusshttps://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-r ... ?t=2488909Seems the 877VA will handle PPPoE, so does Exetel deliver FTTN via IPOE or PPPoE?http://pingbin.com/2014/09/cisco-887va- ... iguration/I haven't given any thought to it, but this http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/r ... index.html
HFC NBN is being installed to my area and I'm looking to upgrade the router, as I don't believe it will have enough CPU to deal with a 50 or 100 Mb/s connection. posted 2017-Mar-7, 11:47 am AEST DMZ is correct here. Frequent Contributor In response to brg.cisco. posted 2017-Oct-21, 1:24 pm AEST posted 2017-Mar-7, 1:09 pm AEST Typical Cisco BS. Better to use separate access points. posted 2017-Apr-29, 10:28 pm AEST The more you ask it to do, the slower it goes. posted 2017-Oct-22, 5:23 pm AEST I just want to ask if anyone know how to configure the static IP from NBN into the cisco router, or if there is no way of achieving this. If you want to get better performance you can look at dropping some of the functions on the device to see what type of impact this will have.